Agreements among the different stakeholder agencies and organizations in the Bay Area may be required to realize the integration proposed in the Bay Area ITS
Architecture.Each connection between (and some
connections within) projects in the Bay Area ITS
Architecture represents the need for cooperation between stakeholders and a potential agreement.
Agreement focus
The focus of agreements is usually on the scope-of-service and specific agency responsibilities for various components of the service,
rather than on particular technologies.
For example, agreements should describe the information that each agency needs to exchange in order to meet the goals and expectations of the other rather than defining how the delivery of that information will occur.
List of agreements
The table below presents a list of potential
agreements categorized by ITS service area. It was developed based on the regional roles
and responsibilities, knowledge of the types of existing or planned
ITS projects for implementation by the region, and the information
that needs to be exchanged in order to operate those systems. Further information regarding
agreements for ITS projects can be found in FHWA's
Regional ITS Architecture Guidance Document,
including definitions of the
types of agreements
as referenced below.
ITS Service
Involved Stakeholders
Type of Agreement
Status
Agreement Description
Bay Area Examples, if any
Interjurisdictional Traffic Management
Caltrans D4, other adjacent Caltrans districts, CHP, and other Bay Area TMCs, MTC, SMART corridors
Interagency Agreement;
Memorandum of Understanding;
Exists
Provides for data exchange and device control and details jurisdiction-to-jurisdiction operations and regional incident management.
SMART Corridor
Agreements;
Center-to-Center MOU;
Agreement with Caltrans for Deployment of ETC Readers;
Regional Traffic Management and Emergency Services
Caltrans and Local Cities and Counties and Emergency Services Providers
Memorandum of Understanding
Exists
Provides for signal operations and coordination and local incident management.
SMART
Corridor Agreements
Emergency Vehicle Signal Pre-emption
Caltrans and/or Local Cities and Counties and Emergency Services Providers
Interagency Agreement
May exist in some form which could be amended
Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections within a city for police, fire, ambulance, or other agency.
SMART
Corridor Agreements;
Local agreements by bordering cities;
Transit Signal Priority
Caltrans and/or Local Cities and Counties and Transit Agencies
Interagency Agreement
Exists
Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for transit vehicle priority at signalized intersection within a city for a transit agency.
SMART
Corridor Agreements
Freeway Service Patrol
MTC, Caltrans, and CHP
Interagency Agreement
Exists
Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for providing freeway service patrol activities.
MOU for FSP
operations;
Partnership Operation Procedures for
day-to-day responsibilities;
Transit Fare Management
All Transit Agencies (Clipper®)
Interagency Agreement
Exists
Provides details on the usage of a common regional fare card and the cost allocation formulas.
Caltrans and/or Local Cities and Counties and Transit Agencies
Interagency Agreement
Exists
Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for operation, maintenance, data-sharing, and funding of SMART corridors and other corridor projects
SMART Corridor Agreements
Traveler Information
All Agencies and Information Service Providers (media)
Memorandum of
Understanding;
Interagency Agreement;
Exists
Documents expectations, roles, and responsibilities for the provision of transportation-related data and information to the traveling public. Also, documents the policy or disclaimer for release of traveler information.