Stakeholder agreements

Agreements among the different stakeholder agencies and organizations in the Bay Area may be required to realize the integration proposed in the Bay Area ITS Architecture. Each connection between (and some connections within) projects in the Bay Area ITS Architecture represents the need for cooperation between stakeholders and a potential agreement.

Agreement focus

The focus of agreements is usually on the scope-of-service and specific agency responsibilities for various components of the service, rather than on particular technologies.  For example, agreements should describe the information that each agency needs to exchange in order to meet the goals and expectations of the other rather than defining how the delivery of that information will occur.

List of agreements

 The table below presents a list of potential agreements categorized by ITS service area. It was developed based on the regional roles and responsibilities, knowledge of the types of existing or planned ITS projects for implementation by the region, and the information that needs to be exchanged in order to operate those systems. Further information regarding agreements for ITS projects can be found in FHWA's Regional ITS Architecture Guidance Document, including definitions of the types of agreements as referenced below.

ITS Service

Involved Stakeholders

Type of Agreement

Status

Agreement Description

Bay Area Examples, if any

Interjurisdictional Traffic Management

Caltrans D4, other adjacent Caltrans districts, CHP, and other Bay Area TMCs, MTC, SMART corridors

Interagency Agreement;

Memorandum of Understanding;

Exists

Provides for data exchange and device control and details jurisdiction-to-jurisdiction operations and regional incident management.

SMART Corridor Agreements;

Center-to-Center MOU;

Agreement with Caltrans for Deployment of ETC Readers;

Regional Traffic Management and Emergency Services

Caltrans and Local Cities and Counties and Emergency Services Providers

Memorandum of Understanding

Exists

Provides for signal operations and coordination and local incident management.

SMART Corridor Agreements

Emergency Vehicle Signal Pre-emption

Caltrans and/or Local Cities and Counties and Emergency Services Providers

Interagency Agreement

May exist in some form which could be amended

Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections within a city for police, fire, ambulance, or other agency.

SMART Corridor Agreements;

Local agreements by bordering cities;

Transit Signal Priority

Caltrans and/or Local Cities and Counties and Transit Agencies

Interagency Agreement

Exists

Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for transit vehicle priority at signalized intersection within a city for a transit agency.

SMART Corridor Agreements

Freeway Service Patrol

MTC, Caltrans, and CHP

 

 

Interagency Agreement

Exists

Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for providing freeway service patrol activities.

MOU for FSP operations;

Partnership Operation Procedures for day-to-day responsibilities;

Transit Fare Management

All Transit Agencies (Clipper®)

Interagency Agreement

Exists

Provides details on the usage of a common regional fare card and the cost allocation formulas.

MTC Res. 3866 Revised (Transit Coordination Implementation Plan)

Corridor Agreements

Caltrans and/or Local Cities and Counties and Transit Agencies

Interagency Agreement

Exists

 

Documents details on roles, responsibilities, and functions for operation, maintenance, data-sharing, and funding of SMART corridors and other corridor projects

SMART Corridor Agreements

Traveler Information

All Agencies and Information Service Providers (media)

Memorandum of Understanding;

Interagency Agreement;

 

Exists

Documents expectations, roles, and responsibilities for the provision of transportation-related data and information to the traveling public. Also, documents the policy or disclaimer for release of traveler information.

MTC Res. 3866 Revised (Transit Coordination Implementation Plan);

Data Disseminator Agreements;

API Terms & Conditions;

Archived Data Management

All Agencies and PeMS

Memorandum of Understanding

New, not pre-existing

Documents expectations, roles, and responsibilities for the dissemination of transportation-related data and information for archive purposes.

Data Disseminator Agreements

Cross-Cutting (shared use of fiber infrastructure)

Multiple agencies

Interagency Agreement

New, not pre-existing

Documents provisions for design, development, maintenance, and revenue sharing (if applicable) with regards to shared use of fiber.

Center-to-Center program MOU

Regional Parking Payment

Public and Private sector agencies

Interagency Agreement

New, not pre-existing

Documents provisions for design, development, maintenance, enforcement, price setting, and revenue sharing

Data Disseminator Agreements

Real Time Transit Information

Transit agencies and MTC

Interagency Agreement

Exists

Documents provisions for funding with stipulations for data sharing and maintenance

MTC Res. 3866 Revised (Transit Coordination Implementation Plan)

Congestion Pricing/Express Lanes

Caltrans, MTC, Local Cities and Counties, CHP, and Express Lane Operators

Memorandum of Understanding;

Interagency Agreement

New, not pre-existing

Documents provisions for design, development, maintenance, enforcement, price setting, and revenue sharing

Cooperative agreements between BATA and regional agencies for FasTrak® services